Medical Disclaimer: This calculator provides a general estimate based on established research and is for educational purposes only, not a substitute for medical advice. Individual results can vary based on health conditions, so consult a qualified healthcare professional or registered dietitian before making significant changes to your diet, exercise, or health routine. Read our full Medical Disclaimer.
How Functional Threshold Power (FTP) Is Calculated
Functional threshold power (FTP) is the highest average power, in watts, that a cyclist can hold in a steady state for about one hour¹. A full hour test is hard to repeat, so most riders do a shorter test and multiply the result by a fixed factor. This calculator applies that factor, then splits your FTP into the seven Coggan power zones.
What FTP Measures
FTP is a single watts number that stands for the hardest pace you could keep up for roughly an hour. Coaches use it as the anchor for training zones. It is not your VO2 max or a heart rate, and it does not show calories burned. It is a field estimate, not a lab measurement.
The Formula
FTP from a 20-minute test = average power x 0.95
FTP from an 8-minute test = higher of two 8-minute average powers x 0.90
FTP from a ramp test = best 1-minute power x 0.75
Watts per kg = FTP in watts / body weight in kg
TrainingPeaks credits the 20-minute method to Hunter Allen and Andrew Coggan, and the 8-minute method to Chris Carmichael and Jim Rutberg². Zwift uses 75% of the best one-minute power during its ramp test³.
How This Calculator Computes Your Result
Pick a test, then enter the average watts from that test. For the ramp test, enter your best 1-minute average power from the whole test, including any part of the last step you finished. If you already know your FTP, choose that option and enter it directly. Body weight (kg or lb) and sex are optional. Weight is needed only for watts per kg, and sex is used only for the rating table below.
FTP is rounded to the nearest whole watt, and half a watt rounds up. Pounds are converted with 1 lb = 0.45359237 kg. Watts per kg is shown to two decimals. Your zones are built from the rounded FTP, and each zone starts 1 W above the top of the one before it, so there are no gaps.
What Your Result Means
Your result is your FTP in watts, watts per kg if you gave a weight, and seven power zones. The percentages below are Coggan's power training levels⁴ ⁵. The example column is for an FTP of 250 W.
Zone | Name | Percent of FTP | Example at 250 W | How it feels |
1 | Active Recovery | Up to 55% | 0 to 138 W | Very easy spinning |
2 | Endurance | 56 to 75% | 139 to 188 W | All-day pace, you can talk |
3 | Tempo | 76 to 90% | 189 to 225 W | Brisk, focus needed |
4 | Threshold | 91 to 105% | 226 to 263 W | Hard, usually done in 10 to 30 minute repeats |
5 | VO2max | 106 to 120% | 264 to 300 W | Intervals of about 3 to 8 minutes |
6 | Anaerobic Capacity | 121 to 150% | 301 to 375 W | Intervals of about 30 seconds to 3 minutes |
7 | Neuromuscular Power | Above 150% | 376 W and up | Short, all-out sprints |
The zone descriptions follow Coggan's TrainingPeaks article⁴. That article lists Zone 6 as "above 121%" and gives Zone 7 no percentage. Allen's TrainingPeaks article gives Zone 6 as 121 to 150% and Zone 7 as above 150%⁵, and this calculator uses those limits. Zone 7 is best judged by effort, not by a watts target.
What Your Watts Per Kilogram Means
Watts per kg compares riders of different sizes. The ratings below are Garmin's FTP ratings, which Garmin says are based on research by Hunter Allen and Andrew Coggan⁶. They are a rough guide, not a medical or racing standard.
Rating | Men (W/kg) | Women (W/kg) |
Superior | 5.05 and above | 4.30 and above |
Excellent | 3.93 to 5.04 | 3.33 to 4.29 |
Good | 2.79 to 3.92 | 2.36 to 3.32 |
Fair | 2.23 to 2.78 | 1.90 to 2.35 |
Untrained | Below 2.23 | Below 1.90 |
How Well Does an FTP Estimate Match Your Real Threshold?
Reasonably well on average, less well for one person. In a study of 23 trained male cyclists, 95% of 20-minute power was close to the power from a 60-minute time trial on average. But for individual riders the gap between methods was wide. Across comparisons of 20-minute power, 60-minute power and a lab threshold, the limits of agreement ran from about 40 W below to 32 W above, up to 62 W below to 60 W above¹. The authors said the two should not be used interchangeably for one athlete¹.
Against lab markers, the picture depends on fitness. In 20 male cyclists, FTP averaged 240 W and the lactate threshold averaged 246 W, with a strong link (r = 0.95). In recreational riders, though, FTP read lower than the lactate threshold⁷. Another study of 18 well-trained adults (12 men and 6 women) found that power at the maximal lactate steady state was about 88.5% of 20-minute power, and about 93.1% of the 95% value. In 10 riders retested after 7 months of training, the lactate steady state improved but FTP did not change⁸.
Researchers also argue that critical power, not the lactate steady state, marks the true edge of steady-state exercise, and that the two measures are not interchangeable⁹. Put simply, FTP is a useful training number. It is not a precise physiological line.
Power Zones by FTP
The seven Coggan power zones in watts for a range of FTPs. Zone 7 has no upper limit, so it is drawn as a short stub.
- Z1 Active Recovery
- Z2 Endurance
- Z3 Tempo
- Z4 Threshold
- Z5 VO2max
- Z6 Anaerobic Capacity
- Z7 Neuromuscular Power
Show data table
| FTP | Z1 Active Recovery | Z2 Endurance | Z3 Tempo | Z4 Threshold | Z5 VO2max | Z6 Anaerobic Capacity | Z7 Neuromuscular Power |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTP 150 W | 0 to 83 W | 84 to 113 W | 114 to 135 W | 136 to 158 W | 159 to 180 W | 181 to 225 W | 226 W and up |
| FTP 175 W | 0 to 96 W | 97 to 131 W | 132 to 158 W | 159 to 184 W | 185 to 210 W | 211 to 263 W | 264 W and up |
| FTP 200 W | 0 to 110 W | 111 to 150 W | 151 to 180 W | 181 to 210 W | 211 to 240 W | 241 to 300 W | 301 W and up |
| FTP 225 W | 0 to 124 W | 125 to 169 W | 170 to 203 W | 204 to 236 W | 237 to 270 W | 271 to 338 W | 339 W and up |
| FTP 250 W | 0 to 138 W | 139 to 188 W | 189 to 225 W | 226 to 263 W | 264 to 300 W | 301 to 375 W | 376 W and up |
| FTP 275 W | 0 to 151 W | 152 to 206 W | 207 to 248 W | 249 to 289 W | 290 to 330 W | 331 to 413 W | 414 W and up |
| FTP 300 W | 0 to 165 W | 166 to 225 W | 226 to 270 W | 271 to 315 W | 316 to 360 W | 361 to 450 W | 451 W and up |
| FTP 325 W | 0 to 179 W | 180 to 244 W | 245 to 293 W | 294 to 341 W | 342 to 390 W | 391 to 488 W | 489 W and up |
| FTP 350 W | 0 to 193 W | 194 to 263 W | 264 to 315 W | 316 to 368 W | 369 to 420 W | 421 to 525 W | 526 W and up |
FTP Ratings by Watts per Kilogram
Garmin's FTP rating bands for men and women. Enter your watts per kg to mark it.
- Untrained
- Fair
- Good
- Excellent
- Superior
Show data table
| Sex | Untrained | Fair | Good | Excellent | Superior |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Men | Below 2.23 | 2.23 to 2.78 | 2.79 to 3.92 | 3.93 to 5.04 | 5.05 and above |
| Women | Below 1.90 | 1.90 to 2.35 | 2.36 to 3.32 | 3.33 to 4.29 | 4.30 and above |
A Note on Accuracy
This calculator gives an estimate. Your real FTP can differ from the result by tens of watts. Pacing, the power meter or trainer used, heat, sleep and fatigue all move the number. Retest in similar conditions to follow your progress, and adjust the result if your zones feel clearly too hard or too easy.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a good FTP for a cyclist?
A good FTP for men is about 2.79 to 3.92 W/kg and for women about 2.36 to 3.32 W/kg, using Garmin's ratings⁶. For example, a 70 kg man with an FTP of 250 W is at 3.57 W/kg.
How do you calculate FTP from a 20-minute test?
Ride the hardest steady 20 minutes you can, then multiply your average power by 0.95. An average of 250 W gives an FTP of 238 W after rounding².
What are the 7 cycling power zones?
They are Active Recovery, Endurance, Tempo, Threshold, VO2max, Anaerobic Capacity and Neuromuscular Power. Each one is a percent of your FTP, from up to 55% for Zone 1 to above 150% for Zone 7⁴ ⁵.
Is an FTP calculator accurate?
It is as accurate as the test power you enter and the fixed factor behind it. Studies show the 20-minute estimate can be off by tens of watts for one rider¹ ⁸, so treat the result as a starting point.
Sources
Functional Threshold Power in Cyclists: Validity of the Concept and Physiological Responses, Borszcz et al., 2018
Performance Assessment Tests for Cyclists and Triathletes, Holmes, 2017
Cycling Power Zones Explained, Coggan, 2016
How to Interpret Cycling Power Data, Allen, 2012
FTP Ratings, Garmin
Is the Functional Threshold Power a Valid Surrogate of the Lactate Threshold?, Valenzuela et al., 2018
Maximal Lactate Steady State Versus the 20-Minute Functional Threshold Power Test in Well-Trained Individuals, Inglis et al., 2020
The Maximal Metabolic Steady State: Redefining the Gold Standard, Jones et al., 2019