Heart Rate Reserve Calculator
Use this heart rate reserve calculator to find your HRR and your Karvonen target heart rates from your age and resting heart rate.
Updated October 2, 2026
Medical Disclaimer: This calculator provides a general estimate based on established research and is for educational purposes only, not a substitute for medical advice. Individual results can vary based on health conditions, so consult a qualified healthcare professional or registered dietitian before making significant changes to your diet, exercise, or health routine. Read our full Medical Disclaimer.
How Heart Rate Reserve Is Calculated
Heart rate reserve (HRR) is the gap between your maximum heart rate and your resting heart rate. It shows how much room your heart has to speed up during exercise. The Karvonen method uses that gap to set target heart rates, so the numbers fit your own resting heart rate.
What Heart Rate Reserve Measures
HRR is the number of beats per minute (bpm) between rest and your top effort. A person with a lower resting heart rate has a bigger reserve at the same age. HRR is not a fitness score and it does not diagnose anything. A normal resting heart rate for adults is 60 to 100 bpm when calm, and lower rates are common in athletes¹.
The Formula
HRR = HRmax - resting heart rate
Target heart rate = (HRR x intensity) + resting heart rate
The target heart rate method is named after Martti Karvonen, whose 1957 training study found that fitness gains began at around 60% of heart rate reserve². If you do not know your max heart rate, the calculator estimates it with one of three age formulas: Fox (220 - age), Tanaka (208 - 0.7 x age) or Gellish (207 - 0.7 x age)³ ⁴.
How This Calculator Computes Your Result
Enter your age and resting heart rate. Optionally, enter a max heart rate you measured in a hard test, or pick one of the three formulas. Tanaka is the default. If you enter a measured max, the formula is not used. The calculator rounds your max heart rate to a whole number, subtracts your resting heart rate to get HRR, then shows a target range in bpm for each intensity band. All values are in beats per minute.
What Your Result Means
Your result is your HRR in bpm plus a target heart rate range for each band. The bands below come from the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) and are based on percent of heart rate reserve⁵. The example column is for a 40-year-old with a resting heart rate of 60 bpm and a Tanaka max of 180 bpm (HRR of 120 bpm).
Intensity | Percent of HRR | Example target (bpm) |
Very light | Below 30% | Below 96 |
Light | 30% to 39% | 96 to 107 |
Moderate | 40% to 59% | 108 to 131 |
Vigorous | 60% to 89% | 132 to 167 |
Near-maximal to maximal | 90% and above | 168 to 180 |
Moderate and vigorous bands are the ones ACSM recommends for most adults⁵.
Why Resting Heart Rate Changes Your Zones
A plain percent of max heart rate ignores resting heart rate. The Karvonen method does not. Take two 40-year-olds with the same max of 180 bpm. At 60% intensity, a person with a resting rate of 50 bpm gets a target of 128 bpm. A person with a resting rate of 80 bpm gets 140 bpm. The ACSM position stand notes that heart rate reserve methods may be preferable, because exercise intensity can be underestimated or overestimated when using percent of max heart rate alone⁵.
Percent of HRR is also not the same number as percent of max. For the 40-year-old above, 60% of HRR is 132 bpm, while 60% of max would be only 108 bpm. Do not compare a Karvonen target with a percent of max chart.
How Accurate Is the Max Heart Rate Estimate?
The formulas are averages, so they miss for individuals. The 220 minus age rule traces to a 1971 paper by Fox and colleagues, and Robergs and Landwehr found it was not derived from original research⁶. They reported an error of 7 to 11 bpm in max heart rate estimates⁶. Tanaka and colleagues built their formula from 351 studies covering 18,712 people, plus lab tests on 514 people. They found it held across sex and activity level, and that 220 minus age underestimates max heart rate in older adults³. Gellish and colleagues, tracking 132 people through 908 tests over 25 years, reached almost the same line⁴.
In a 2025 test of 230 adults who did a maximal treadmill test, all three formulas had an average error near 9 bpm (RMSE), and the range for most individuals was about plus or minus 18 to 24 bpm⁷. In plain terms, the standard deviation is around 10 bpm. Your real max could be 10 bpm higher or lower than the formula says, and sometimes more. If you want more precision, use a measured max from a supervised maximal test.
A Note on Accuracy
This calculator gives estimates, not prescriptions. Age-based max heart rate formulas can miss by about 10 bpm or more for one person, and your zones move with that error. Resting heart rate changes from day to day with sleep, caffeine, stress, heat and illness, so use an average of several mornings. Some medicines, such as beta blockers, lower heart rate, and the formulas do not account for them. If you have a heart condition or take heart medicine, ask your doctor which heart rate targets suit you.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do you calculate heart rate reserve?
Subtract your resting heart rate from your maximum heart rate. For example, a max of 180 bpm and a resting rate of 60 bpm gives a heart rate reserve of 120 bpm.
What is a normal resting heart rate?
A normal resting heart rate for adults is 60 to 100 beats per minute when you are calm and feeling well¹. A lower rate is common in people who train often.
What is the Karvonen formula?
Target heart rate equals heart rate reserve times your chosen intensity, plus your resting heart rate. At 70% with a reserve of 120 bpm and a resting rate of 60 bpm, the target is 144 bpm.
Is the heart rate reserve calculator accurate?
It is as accurate as the max heart rate behind it. The age formulas have an error of about 10 bpm for one person⁶ ⁷, so treat the zones as a starting point and adjust by how the effort feels.
Sources
All About Heart Rate, American Heart Association
The Science of Exercise Prescription: Martti Karvonen and His Contributions, Ignaszewski et al., 2017
Age-Predicted Maximal Heart Rate Revisited, Tanaka et al., 2001
Longitudinal Modeling of the Relationship Between Age and Maximal Heart Rate, Gellish et al., 2007
Quantity and Quality of Exercise for Developing and Maintaining Fitness in Apparently Healthy Adults, Garber et al., American College of Sports Medicine, 2011
The Surprising History of the HRmax=220-age Equation, Robergs and Landwehr, 2002
Accuracy of Age-Based Maximal Heart Rate Equations Across Fitness Levels, Martin et al., 2025