Medical Disclaimer: This calculator provides a general estimate based on established research and is for educational purposes only, not a substitute for medical advice. Individual results can vary based on health conditions, so consult a qualified healthcare professional or registered dietitian before making significant changes to your diet, exercise, or health routine. Read our full Medical Disclaimer.
How Calories Burned Playing Rugby Is Calculated
Calories burned playing rugby is the energy your body uses to run, tackle, scrum, ruck and recover over a match or training session. The two biggest drivers are your body weight and how long you are on the field. This tool turns those into one estimate using standard values for rugby union and touch rugby.
What the Rugby Calorie Estimate Measures
The result estimates the total energy you use in the time you enter. Because it is a gross figure, your resting burn over the same time is included. It does not know your position, how many tackles you made or how fit you are.
The Formula
Calories (kcal) = MET x body weight (kg) x time (hours)
Rugby union, competitive: MET 8.3 (code 15560)
Touch rugby, non-competitive: MET 6.3 (code 15562)
METs compare an activity to sitting at rest, where 1 MET is about 1 kcal per kg of body weight per hour. The two rugby values are taken from the 2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities, whose data covers adults aged 19 to 59¹.
How This Calculator Computes Your Result
Enter your age group, weight (lb or kg), type of rugby and time. The types are rugby union (MET 8.3), rugby league or sevens, and social touch or tag rugby (MET 6.3). The compendium has no separate entry for rugby league or sevens, so this calculator uses the rugby union value and says so on your result.
"Whole session" is the default: enter the time you were playing, because normal stoppages for scrums, kicks and injuries are already part of the rugby values. "Split my session" lets you add long breaks (half-time, the bench, water breaks, team talks), which are not counted, and labels the result "active time only". If you came on as a replacement, enter only your minutes on the field.
The tool rounds every calorie figure to the nearest 5 kcal and shows calories per hour, per 30 minutes, and a 30 and 60 minute table for both rugby values at your weight. Rugby players 60 and over see the adult result with a note, since rugby is not in the older adult list. Under 18s see a note instead of a result, because youth values differ.
What Your Result Means
The figure is the energy used in that rugby session, not a number to aim for. The 80 minute column is a full match for a player who stays on the field.
Body weight | Union, 30 min | Union, 60 min | Union, 80 min | Touch, 60 min |
70 kg (154 lb) | 290 kcal | 580 kcal | 775 kcal | 440 kcal |
90 kg (198 lb) | 375 kcal | 745 kcal | 995 kcal | 565 kcal |
110 kg (243 lb) | 455 kcal | 915 kcal | 1215 kcal | 695 kcal |
A heavy player who stays on for the full match can pass 1,000 kcal by this estimate. A replacement who plays 25 minutes burns far less, even if those minutes are hard.
What Changes Your Burn in Rugby
Forward or back. In elite English union matches, backs covered more ground (about 6,127 m against 5,581 m), but forwards spent about 7 minutes 56 seconds in scrums, mauls and tackles, against about 1 minute 18 seconds for backs². In an elite union squad followed for six days, forwards used about 15.9 MJ (about 3,800 kcal) a day and backs about 14.0 MJ (about 3,350 kcal)³. This calculator uses one value for all positions, but it does count your weight.
Contact work. Pushing in a scrum or driving a maul is hard work with little movement, so distance figures do not show it. The armbands used to measure that union squad could not be worn during contact work, so its numbers likely miss some of it⁴.
The week, not just the game. In professional rugby league players, daily energy use rose from about 17.9 MJ in one week to 24.2 MJ the next as training load went up⁵. The union value is for competitive play, so a light skills session likely burns less than shown.
Touch rugby pace. Touch has no tackles, but competitive touch is fast. Men's international and regional players covered about 126 to 137 m per minute in matches⁶. The compendium only lists social touch, so a fast competitive game may burn more than shown.
What Studies of Rugby Players Show
The reference method for daily energy use is doubly labeled water: players drink water tagged with harmless tracers, and later samples show how much energy they used over about two weeks. In 27 elite English players aged under 16 to under 24, average daily energy use was about 4,365 kcal in rugby union and 4,369 kcal in rugby league, about twice their resting rate⁴. Individual players varied widely, from about 3,450 to 6,600 kcal a day across the whole group⁴. In six senior Super League players, the forwards and backs used similar amounts (21.6 and 20.5 MJ a day), and the authors judged the difference unclear⁵. These are whole-day totals, so your session result is only one part of a player's day.
Rugby vs Soccer, Football, Wrestling and Running
Here is 60 minutes of each activity at 70 kg (154 lb) and 90 kg (198 lb), using compendium values¹. "Football" here means American football.
Activity | Code | MET | 70 kg, 60 min | 90 kg, 60 min |
Soccer, competitive | 15605 | 9.5 | 665 kcal | 855 kcal |
Running, 6 to 6.3 mph | 12050 | 9.3 | 650 kcal | 835 kcal |
Rugby union, competitive | 15560 | 8.3 | 580 kcal | 745 kcal |
American football, competitive | 15210 | 8.0 | 560 kcal | 720 kcal |
Touch rugby, non-competitive | 15562 | 6.3 | 440 kcal | 565 kcal |
Wrestling, competitive | 15730 | 6.0 | 420 kcal | 540 kcal |
Rugby union sits just below competitive soccer and running at 6 mph in the compendium. The values reflect the studies behind each row, not proof that one sport is harder than another, and rugby's contact work is hard to measure in a real match⁴. Position matters in touch too: in amateur mixed touch matches, players in the middle position had the highest physical demands and heart rates, though most differences were small⁷.
A Note on Accuracy
The rugby union value is a single average for a competitive game, and the same number is used for a prop who scrums all match and a winger who sprints a few times. League and sevens borrow the union value, and touch has only a social value. Your real burn depends on your minutes, your position, how much contact you do and your fitness. Use the result as a rough guide and a way to compare sessions, not an exact count.
Frequently Asked Questions
How many calories do you burn playing rugby?
By the compendium value, a 90 kg (198 lb) adult burns about 745 kcal per hour of competitive rugby union, and a 70 kg (154 lb) adult about 580 kcal¹. Social touch rugby burns about 440 to 565 kcal per hour at those weights.
Do forwards burn more calories than backs?
Often, yes, but not always. In one elite union squad forwards used about 450 kcal more per day than backs³, while a doubly labeled water study in rugby league found no clear difference between the two⁵.
How many calories do rugby players burn a day?
Elite young rugby players measured with doubly labeled water used about 4,370 kcal a day on average, ranging from about 3,450 to 6,600 kcal between players⁴. That total covers the whole day, not just training or matches.
How accurate is a rugby calories burned calculator?
It is a reasonable rugby estimate rather than an exact figure. Rugby studies show large differences between players of the same code and age⁴, so your own burn could be well above or below the result.
Sources
2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities, Herrmann et al., 2024
The Physical Demands of Elite English Rugby Union, Roberts et al., 2008
Energy Intake and Expenditure in an Elite European Rugby Union Squad, Bradley et al., 2015
Energy Expenditure of Rugby Players Measured Using Doubly Labelled Water, Smith et al., 2018
Total Energy Expenditure of Professional Rugby League Players, Morehen et al., 2016
Movement and Physiological Demands of Men's Touch Rugby Matches, Beaven et al., 2014
Match Demands of Amateur Mixed Gender Touch Players, Vickery and Harkness, 2017