Lean Body Mass Calculator
Use this lean body mass calculator to estimate your LBM, the weight of your body excluding fat mass.
Updated October 22, 2026
Medical Disclaimer: This calculator provides a general estimate based on established research and is for educational purposes only, not a substitute for medical advice. Individual results can vary based on health conditions, so consult a qualified healthcare professional or registered dietitian before making significant changes to your diet, exercise, or health routine. Read our full Medical Disclaimer.
How Lean Body Mass (LBM) Is Calculated
Lean body mass is your total body weight minus body fat: muscle, bone, organs, and water. It’s a useful baseline for tracking strength and metabolic changes over time, and it’s the input several other calculators on this site build on, most directly the Katch-McArdle path in the TDEE Calculator.
What This Calculator Measures
This estimates lean mass from height and weight alone, without requiring a body fat measurement. If you already know your body fat percentage, that’s a more direct route to the same number, since lean mass is simply your weight times one minus your body fat fraction.
The Formula
This calculator uses the Boer formula¹, developed from a Dutch adult sample and still one of the most widely used height-weight equations for lean mass in clinical settings.
Men: LBM = 0.407 × weight (kg) + 0.267 × height (cm) − 19.2
Women: LBM = 0.252 × weight (kg) + 0.473 × height (cm) − 48.3
How This Calculator Computes Your Result
Enter your sex, height, and weight above. We run the Boer formula directly and also report estimated fat mass as the remainder of your total body weight.
How Boer Compares to Other Formulas
Boer isn’t the only height-weight equation for lean mass. An earlier formula developed from a British sample² tends to produce noticeably lower estimates at typical modern body weights. In the worked example below it comes in 3.6 kg under Boer for the man and 1.2 kg under for the woman.
A more recent equation built from a much larger dataset spanning normal-weight through severely obese adults³ explicitly accounts for the fact that, at very high body weights, additional weight is overwhelmingly fat rather than lean tissue, something the older linear formulas don’t capture. Height-weight formulas are known to be inconsistent at the extremes of body size³.
The Three Formulas Side by Side
Weight is in kilograms and height in centimeters. BMI is weight ÷ height in meters squared.
Formula | Men | Women |
Boer¹ (used here) | 0.407 × weight + 0.267 × height − 19.2 | 0.252 × weight + 0.473 × height − 48.3 |
Hume² | 0.32810 × weight + 0.33929 × height − 29.5336 | 0.29569 × weight + 0.41813 × height − 43.2933 |
Janmahasatian³ | 9,270 × weight ÷ (6,680 + 216 × BMI) | 9,270 × weight ÷ (8,780 + 244 × BMI) |
Worked Example
Take a man who is 180 cm and 80 kg. Boer gives 0.407 × 80 + 0.267 × 180 − 19.2 = 32.56 + 48.06 − 19.2 = 61.4 kg of lean mass. The calculator then reports fat mass as the remainder: 80 − 61.4 = 18.6 kg. Here is how the three formulas compare for him and for a woman who is 165 cm and 65 kg:
Formula | Man, 180 cm, 80 kg | Woman, 165 cm, 65 kg |
Boer | 61.4 kg | 46.1 kg |
Hume | 57.8 kg | 44.9 kg |
Janmahasatian | 61.7 kg | 41.3 kg |
For these two typical adults the formulas land within about 4 to 5 kg of each other. That spread is a useful reminder that any single result is an estimate. If you use imperial units, the calculator converts your entries to kilograms and centimeters, runs Boer, and converts the result back to pounds, shown to one decimal place.
Lean Body Mass vs Fat-Free Mass
The two terms are often used interchangeably. When the term lean body mass was introduced in 1942, it was described as including a small amount of "essential" structural fat, while fat-free mass was meant to contain no fat at all⁴. A 2024 review concluded that, as fat-free mass is actually measured, it already includes those structural lipids, so the two are chemically the same, and it recommends using the term fat-free mass⁴.
In practice, body composition methods such as DEXA measure fat-free mass, and there is no separate reference method for lean body mass³. So the lean mass you get from a body fat percentage, as described above, is really fat-free mass, and you can compare it directly with this estimate. Fat-free mass is also the starting point for the FFMI Calculator, which adjusts it for height.
Why It Matters
Two people can weigh the same yet have very different body composition. Tracking lean mass alongside weight shows whether changes come from muscle or fat. This is a formula-based estimate, and DEXA scans or BIA scales are more precise.
A Note on Accuracy
Boer formula estimates can vary from direct measurement methods by a few kilograms, and different height-weight formulas can disagree with each other, particularly at low or high body weights. Use it to track relative change over weeks, not as a precise clinical value.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is lean body mass?
Lean body mass is your total body weight minus fat mass. It includes muscle, bone, organs, and water, giving a picture of everything that isn't fat.
Which formula does this calculator use?
The Boer formula¹, a well-established equation for estimating lean body mass from height and weight.
Why do different LBM formulas give different results?
Each was built from a different study population using different methods¹,²,³. At typical body weights they usually land within a few kilograms of each other, and they diverge more at the extremes of height or weight.
Why track lean body mass instead of just weight?
Total weight doesn't distinguish between muscle and fat, so tracking lean mass helps confirm whether weight changes are coming from fat loss or gain versus muscle loss or gain.
Sources
Estimated Lean Body Mass as an Index for Normalization of Body Fluid Volumes in Humans, Boer, 1984
Prediction of Lean Body Mass from Height and Weight, Hume, 1966
Quantification of Lean Bodyweight, Janmahasatian et al., 2005
Are Lean Body Mass and Fat-Free Mass the Same or Different Body Components? A Critical Perspective, Heymsfield et al., Advances in Nutrition, 2024